Uncategorized

Is Universal Healthcare Actually Promising in Africa?

Universal Healthcare (UHC) the idea that every citizen should have access to essential health services without facing financial hardship, sounds almost utopian. When the World Health Organization and the UN push it as a cornerstone of Sustainable Development Goal 3, most people in wealthy nations nod approvingly. But transplant that vision to sub-Saharan Africa, a region with 1.4 billion people, extreme diversity in income, governance, and infrastructure, and the question becomes far less rhetorical: Is UHC actually promising here, or is it a beautiful slogan that collapses under continental realities?

Let’s examine the evidence without ideological filters.

1. The Success Stories Everyone Cites (and What They Actually Prove)

Rwanda is the poster child. After the 1994 genocide destroyed its health system, Rwanda rolled out community-based health insurance (mutuelles de santé). Today, over 90% of the population is covered, premiums are income-tiered (as low as $2–$8 per person per year), and the government subsidizes the poorest. Life expectancy jumped from 48 in 2000 to 69 in 2023; maternal mortality fell 77% in a decade.

Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS, 2003) and Kenya’s recent moves toward the Social Health Insurance Fund also get applause. Thailand and Mexico are often thrown in as “middle-income” comparators.

What these examples have in common:

  • Strong political championship from the very top (Kagame in Rwanda, raw political survival motive in post-civil war contexts).
  • Heavy reliance on external donor funding in the early years (Rwanda still gets ~30–40% of its health budget from donors).
  • Relatively small, centralized populations (Rwanda 13 million, Thailand 70 million — compare to Nigeria 220 million or DRC 105 million).
  • Aggressive community-level premium collection and enforcement (in Rwanda you literally can’t renew your ID without proving insurance).

These are remarkable achievements, but they are outliers, not blueprints. Replicating Rwanda in the Democratic Republic of Congo is like saying “Singapore works, so just do what Singapore did” to Brazil.

2. The Brutal Fiscal Math

Africa’s average government health spending is ~$34 per capita per year (WHO 2023). The WHO once estimated that a basic package of essential services costs at least $86 per person in low-income settings (2017 dollars, adjusted upward since). Chatham House and others now put a credible minimum closer to $100–$120 excluding capital costs.

Even if every African government magically hit the Abuja Declaration target of 15% of budget to health tomorrow (most are at 5–9%), domestic resources alone cannot close the gap. Tax-to-GDP ratios in sub-Saharan Africa average 16–18%, versus 30–40% in OECD countries. You can’t tax what is informal, subsistence, or simply doesn’t exist.

Result: any serious UHC push remains donor-dependent for the foreseeable future. When donors pivot (COVID, Ukraine, domestic politics), health budgets get slashed overnight — we saw it in the 1980s–90s structural adjustment era, and we’re seeing early signs again.

3. Governance and Leakage: The Elephant in the Room

Corruption and weak institutions aren’t moral failings unique to Africa; they are predictable outcomes when civil-service salaries are unlivable, oversight is thin, and political survival depends on patronage.

In Nigeria, an audit of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund found that in some states less than 10% of released money reached frontline facilities. In Kenya, the “Missing Billions” scandal saw $100 million vanish from the health ministry. Uganda’s Global Fund scandal (tens of millions embezzled) is old news, but the pattern repeats.

Free-at-point-of-use systems are especially vulnerable because the money is “invisible” to citizens. When people pay even tiny premiums (Rwanda) or co-pays (Thailand), they demand accountability. Pure tax-funded models in low-trust environments become elite capture machines.

4. Supply-Side Collapse: You Can Insure People, But Who Treats Them?

Africa has 2.4 doctors, nurses, and midwives per 1,000 people (WHO 2023) against a minimum of 4.45 recommended. Rural areas are wastelands: in Liberia there are counties with zero doctors.

Building a network dense enough for UHC would require training and retaining hundreds of thousands of workers — while competing with brain drain to Europe, North America, and the Gulf. Cuba did it by locking doctors in and paying them peanuts. Few African democracies can (or should) copy that model.

5. So Is It Hopeless?

No. But the honest answer is: “Universal” in the rich-country sense (everyone gets everything, mostly free) is not promising for most of Africa this century.

What is promising — and already happening in pockets — is “progressive universalism”: prioritize a very lean, high-impact package (vaccines, malaria treatment, HIV care, maternal delivery, basic trauma) financed by a mix of sin taxes, donor money, and mandatory community insurance with heavy subsidies for the poor. Rwanda, Ethiopia (its Health Extension Program), and increasingly Morocco and Botswana are doing versions of this.

Key ingredients that actually correlate with progress:

  • Domestic political ownership (not just donor darling status).
  • Some form of contributory mechanism so citizens have skin in the game.
  • Ruthless focus on primary care and prevention, not hospital pyramids.
  • Digital leaps (mobile money for premiums, biometric IDs, supply-chain tracking) that bypass broken bureaucracies.

Bottom Line

Universal Healthcare as a moral vision is unassailable. Universal Healthcare as a technocratic promise — “we will cover everyone for everything by 2030” — is misleading and sets Africa up for disappointment.

A more honest slogan would be: “Aggressive, pragmatic, progressively broader coverage with fierce protection of every dollar.” It’s less sexy than “Healthcare for All,” but it’s the only version that has any chance of surviving contact with reality.

Africa doesn’t need another imported utopia. It needs systems that work in Kinshasa traffic, Juba rains, and Lagos density — built by Africans, paid for increasingly by Africans, and accountable to Africans.

That version of “universal” is hard, slow, and uneven… but it is undeniably promising.

Comment here

Join our Audience